This week, I quoted A.W. Tozer with a statement that may be familiar to many of you:
What comes into our minds when we think about God is the most important thing about us.
Tozer's idea is that our conception of God defines who we are as individuals, establishes our values and priorities, and locates our meaning. Therefore, Tozer posits, we'd better have very clear and accurate ideas about who God is - it's essential for us to enjoy the human experience to the fullest.
Whether someone believes that God exists or not, one could agree with Tozer on this point. An atheist who is quite convinced there is no god could concur - that what comes into my mind when I think about God is that he doesn't exist is the most important thing about me. An agnostic, a Muslim, a Catholic, a Protestant, a polytheist, a social gospel adherent, a liberation theologian, or an evangelical - all could conceivably concur.
If Tozer has a point, then it becomes imperative for me to listen to you (the "I and thou" of Buber's existentialism). Reflexively, it is imperative for you to listen to me. If the most important thing about you is what comes into your mind when you think about God, then in order for me to know what's most important about you, I need to listen to what you say about God. I need to hear what comes into your mind on this topic. I cannot learn what is most important about you if I don't listen to what's in your mind about the divine.
Even if you don't believe any god exists, I must listen. Even if you think he's vastly different than I do, I need to listen. Even if you think he's horrible, mean, unfair, uncaring, uninvolved, I need to listen in order to know what's most important about you. But not merely listening in order to effectively shoot down your points - really listening.
If I jump right in and disagree (to "set you straight"), I don't listen. And then I don't learn the most important part of you. If I argue, get defensive, get offensive, or otherwise shut down what you have to say on this, I won't know you. No, I must listen, whether I think you're right or wrong or somewhere in between. It's the only way to value the You that you are. I would hope that you would listen, too, in order to know the Me that is me.
I want to know you. Specificallly, I want to know what's most important about you. Shutting up and listening is not my natural bent, but it is imperative for me to do so, if Tozer's got it right.
I also want you to know the God I know. I do think He's awesome. But I know that if I don't value you and learn what's most important about you, I'd be conveying to you something about God that isn't true - that He's not a listener.
Good stuff my friend!
ReplyDelete"Oh Jacob thou worm, I'll save you." We can never conceive who and what God truly is, for our personalities / minds / reality are as worms to him. Faith is the bridge, but we're better off to recognize the shadow of a magnitude. When He castigated Job, Job sensed that shadow of a magnitude. This is what it means to fear the Lord. Otherwise, we will miscreate Him to burn witches, or gays. Love is that bridge...
ReplyDelete"Worm theology" captures the autonomous value of man. God puts Job in his place by revealing His own nature more fully - the magnitude of God defines the place of man.
ReplyDeleteRedemption, on the other hand, places a tremendous value of man as the object, value from without not within. Undeserved, unmerited, but now "artificially" of high value, placed on us by God, now restoring the imago Dei we were created with. Rightly understood, this results in humility, not pride.
The imago in others is yet another reason not to burn, judge, condemn, or despise others - the value God placed on them as a creative act, rather their their own, inherent value.